22nd Supreme Court: Difference between revisions

22nd Supreme Court
	← 21st — 22nd — 23rd →
Leadership
Chief Justice	New Arkados
Dates
Start	22 June 2021
End	23 September 2021

Browse history interactively

Content added Content deleted

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 05:06, 8 January 2022

The 22nd Supreme Court was appointed by Secretary New Samon and confirmed by citizens in individual confidence votes. This consisted of three Standing Justices and one Alternate Justice, and each served a three-month term from 22 June to 23 September 2021. The final members of the 22nd Supreme Court were Chief Justice New Arkados, Minor Justices Eloren and Grod Island, and Alternate Justice Super Awesome Fun Times.

Members

Chief Justice
(int. elected)

New Arkados
^{24 Jun 2021-29 Sep 2021}

Eloren
^{22 Jun 2021-23 Sep 2021}

Standing Justices (3)
(appointed)

Grod Island
^{22 Jun 2021-23 Sep 2021}

New Arkados
^{22 Jun 2021-23 Sep 2021}

Alternate Justice
(appointed)

Super Awesome Fun Times
^{22 Jun 2021-23 Sep 2021}

│

Days into term

│

0

│

15

│

30

│

45

│

60

│

75

│

90

│

105

Confirmations

Initial

The following were the results of the confidence votes on Secretary New Samon's initial appointees to the Supreme Court:

Position	Appointee	Result
Standing Justice	Eloren	36-0 (6)
	Grod Island	38-0 (4)
	New Arkados	35-0 (7)
Alternate Justice	Super Awesome Fun Times	36-0 (6)

As a result, all four appointees were confirmed to their posts.

Court verdicts

Banjection of Ludwigsburg

A trial request against Ludwigsburg, presented by Chief Justice New Arkados, was filed on 25 August 2021 with 11 alleged counts of "Spamming or trolling that disrupts regional activity or personal communications"^[1]. The Supreme Court unanimously agreed to the hosting of a trial on 26 August, and New Arkados contacted all parties involved to confirm a trial date.^[2]

However, before a date for the trial could be confirmed or announced, Ludwigsburg publicly insisted on 27 August that the trial be held on the RMB, before reversing course later that day and informing the Court they would "accept punishment without a trial". The Court ultimately issued Ludwigsburg a banjection of 2 weeks from 30 August 2021 in a unanimous decision,^[3] citing historical precedent for the crime's severity from the Tobostan v. Llorens (2018) verdict, though Alternate Justice Super Awesome Fun Times also noted that Ludwigsburg's actions had continued throughout the prosecution process and were likely intentional, indicating "the precedent isn't exactly the same".

Notes

↑ A violation under Section 1.m of the Criminal Offense Act
↑ Court procedure as defined by Sections 2.b and 3.a of the Judicial Process Act, with public notice of the trial intended to be issued "at least one day before it commences"; commencement of this particular case's trial was never confirmed
↑ Punishment issued as per Section 1 of the Criminal Offense Act

[1] A violation under Section 1.m of the Criminal Offense Act

[2] Court procedure as defined by Sections 2.b and 3.a of the Judicial Process Act, with public notice of the trial intended to be issued "at least one day before it commences"; commencement of this particular case's trial was never confirmed

[3] Punishment issued as per Section 1 of the Criminal Offense Act

[1]

[2]

[3]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{infobox
-| title = 21st Supreme Court
+| title = 22nd Supreme Court
 | subheader = {{nowrap|<small>← [[21st Supreme Court|21st]] —</small> [[22nd Supreme Court|22nd]] <small>— [[23rd Supreme Court|23rd]] →</small>}}
 | image1 = [[File:Rosy Red.png|200px]]
@@ Line 128: / Line 128: @@
 A trial request against Ludwigsburg, presented by Chief Justice New Arkados, was filed on 25 August 2021 with 11 alleged counts of "Spamming or trolling that disrupts regional activity or personal communications"{{refn|A violation under Section 1.m of the Criminal Offense Act}}. The Supreme Court unanimously agreed to the hosting of a trial on 26 August, and New Arkados contacted all parties involved to confirm a trial date.{{refn|Court procedure as defined by Sections 2.b and 3.a of the Judicial Process Act, with public notice of the trial intended to be issued "at least one day before it commences"; commencement of this particular case's trial was never confirmed}}
-However, before a date for the trial could be confirmed or announced, Ludwigsburg publicly insisted on 27 August that the trial be held on the RMB, before reversing course later that day and informing the Court they would "accept punishment without a trial". The Court ultimately issued Ludwigsburg a banjection of 2 weeks from 30 August 2021 in a unanimous decision,{{refn|Punishment issued as per Section 1 of the Criminal Offense Act}} citing historical precedent for severity from the [[10th Supreme Court#Tobostan v. Llorens (2018)|Tobostan v. Llorens (2018)]] verdict, though Alternate Justice Super Awesome Fun Times noted Ludwigsburg's actions had continued through the prosecution process and were likely intentional, indicating "the precedent isn't exactly the same".
+However, before a date for the trial could be confirmed or announced, Ludwigsburg publicly insisted on 27 August that the trial be held on the RMB, before reversing course later that day and informing the Court they would "accept punishment without a trial". The Court ultimately issued Ludwigsburg a banjection of 2 weeks from 30 August 2021 in a unanimous decision,{{refn|Punishment issued as per Section 1 of the Criminal Offense Act}} citing historical precedent for the crime's severity from the [[10th Supreme Court#Tobostan v. Llorens (2018)|Tobostan v. Llorens (2018)]] verdict, though Alternate Justice Super Awesome Fun Times also noted that Ludwigsburg's actions had continued throughout the prosecution process and were likely intentional, indicating "the precedent isn't exactly the same".
 ==Notes==