16th Supreme Court: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

16th Supreme Court (edit)

Revision as of 08:58, 26 February 2021

167 bytes added , 3 years ago

m

no edit summary

VisualWikitext

Lawrencedepe

Bureaucrats, Administrators

2,118

edits

Revision as of 02:35, 2 August 2020 (edit) Lawrencedepe (talk \| contribs) (Created page with "{{infobox \| headerstyle = background:#ffcc00; \|- \| header1 = Term Chronology \| label2 = Previous \| data2 = 15th Supreme Court \| label3 = Next \| data3 = 17th Supreme Cour...")		Latest revision as of 08:58, 26 February 2021 (edit) (undo) Lawrencedepe (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: ~~{{infobox~~ ~~\| headerstyle = background:#ffcc00;~~ \|- ~~\| header1 = Term Chronology~~ ~~\| label2 = Previous \| data2 = [[15th Supreme Court]]~~ ~~\| label3 = Next \| data3 = [[17th Supreme Court]]~~ }} {{infobox \| title = 16th Supreme Court \| subheader = {{nowrap\|<small>← [[15th Supreme Court\|15th]] —</small> [[16th Supreme Court\|16th]] <small>— [[17th Supreme Court\|17th]] →</small>}} \| image1 = [[File:Rosy Red.png\|200px]] \| headerstyle = background:#ffcc00; Line 41 ⟶ 34: ==Confirmations== ===Initial=== The following are the results of the confidence votes on Secretary Llorens' initial appointees to the Supreme Court: Line 62 ⟶ 56: The Supreme Court may issue legal rulings on any disputes over the interpretation of regional law. The following are the legal rulings that were issued during the term of the 16th Supreme Court: {\| class="wikitable" style="float:left; width:100%" ! style="width:~~50px~~15%" \| ~~No.~~Ruling name ! style="width:~~75px~~10%" \| Date issued ! style="width:~~300px~~15%" \| ~~Main law/s~~Vote ! style="width:~~300px~~60%" \| ~~Outcome~~Summary of ruling \|- \| align="center" \| [https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=37225204 #45 (Embassy Election Criterion)] \| align="center" \| 22 ~~December~~Dec 2019 \| align="center" \| Supported by Cedoria and New Arkados. Opposed by Illyrian States. ~~\| align="center" \| "Regions shall be exempt from the aforementioned criteria if they are: (a) Historically significant to the region" <small>(Section 2 of the Embassy Act)</small>~~ \| align="center" \| ~~\| align="center" \| The embassies with Antifa and the MT Army are lawful by satisfying this exemption due to their long military service in the anti-fascist effort.~~ * Determined that embassies using informal consensus to govern, rather than a formal system of elections and laws, do not satisfy the condition of having a "regularly elected regional government" * Initiated by a dispute over the legality of the embassy with Anarchy following Minister of Foreign Affairs Greylyn's announcement that he was considering closing the embassy pending public feedback \|} {{The Leftist Assembly}} [[Category:Supreme Courts ~~of The Leftist Assembly~~\|#016]]