Opinion polling: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3:
==Pollsters==
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;"
! style="width:15%" |Pollster
! style="width:10%" |Managed by
! style="width:15%" |Founded
! style="width:15%" |Most recent poll
! Number of polls
! style="width:10%" |Status
! style="width:35%" |Notes
|-
| Aros Polling Institute
| Greylyn
| 10 February 2020
| 11 February 2020
| 1
| Inactive
| OperatesOperated as a subsidarysubsidiary of the Greylyn electoral campaign body.
|-
| Better Assembly FRS
| Feral Rat Stats
| Kavagrad
| 27 November 2019
| 12 November 2021
| 6
| Active
| Founded under the name Feral Rat Stats (FRS), renamed in November 2021.
|
|-
| The Leftist Times Polling
| Dyl/Wascoitan
| 2 September 2021
| 9 September 2021
| Active
| The polling arm of The Leftist Times, an NSLeft-wide news organisation.
|-
| Unity Statistics
| Llorens & Nottinhaps
| 30 October 2019
| 26 February 2021
| 10
| Inactive
| Active
| Also publishespublished the Comrade Index and the Young Comrade Index. Formerly co-managed by Nottinhaps.
|-
| YouLeft
| Wascoitan
| 26 February 2020
| 10 December 2020
| 5
| Inactive
| Active
|
|}
 
Each poll is counted equally regardless of the number of questions presented to respondents. Pollsters are considered inactive if they have not released a poll in 6 months or its manager has decided to cease its operations.
 
==Polling==
===Elections===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:25%; text-align:center;"
! style="width:50%" | Election
! style="width:50%" | Number of polls
|-
| [[December 2019 general election#Opinion polling|December 2019]]
Line 58 ⟶ 63:
| [[September 2020 general election#Opinion polling|September 2020]]
| 1
|-
| [[December 2020 general election#Opinion polling|December 2020]]
| 63
|}
 
===Secretary/Cabinet performance===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:25%; text-align:center;"
! style="width:50%" | Cabinet
! style="width:50%" | Number of polls
|-
| [[1st Argentigrad Cabinet#Opinion polling|1st Argentigrad]]
Line 76 ⟶ 84:
| [[1st Greylyn Cabinet#Opinion polling|1st Greylyn]]
| 4
|-
| [[1st Kavagrad Cabinet#Opinion polling|1st Kavagrad]]
| 2
|-
| [[1st Dyl Cabinet#Opinion polling|1st Dyl]]
| 1
|}
 
===General Assembly performance===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:25%; text-align:center;"
! style="width:50%" | General Assembly
! Cabinet
! style="width:50%" | Number of polls
|-
| [[18th General Assembly#Opinion polling|18th]]
| 2
|-
| [[19th General Assembly#Opinion polling|19th]]
| 101
|-
| [[20th General Assembly#Opinion polling|20th]]
| 51
|}
 
Line 90 ⟶ 110:
On the question of how ministers should be selected for the [[Cabinet]].
 
{|class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="text-align:center; font-size:90%; width:93%"
! rowspan="2" style="width:100px" |Poll source
! rowspan="2" style="width:130px" |Date(s) administered
! rowspan="2" style="width:75px" |Sample size
! rowspan="2" style="width:95px" |Margin of error
! colspan="4" |Results
|-
Line 114 ⟶ 134:
On the question of how ministerial roles should be chosen.
 
{|class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="text-align:center; font-size:90%; width:100%"
! rowspan="2" style="width:100px" |Poll source
! rowspan="2" style="width:130px" |Date(s) administered
! rowspan="2" style="width:75px" |Sample size
! rowspan="2" style="width:95px" |Margin of error
! colspan="4" |Results
|-
!All bound by law
!Some bound by law
!Some specified by law, <br>but not bound by it
!None bound by law
|-
Line 138 ⟶ 158:
On the question of whether one is interested in running for a regionally-elected office.
 
{|class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="text-align:center; font-size:90%; width:68%"
! rowspan="2" style="width:100px" |Poll source
! rowspan="2" style="width:130px" |Date(s) administered
! rowspan="2" style="width:75px" |Sample size
! rowspan="2" style="width:95px" |Margin of error
! colspan="3" |Results
|-
Line 160 ⟶ 180:
On the question of whether one is interested in joining the civil service.
 
{|class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="text-align:center; font-size:90%; width:68%"
! rowspan="2" style="width:100px" |Poll source
! rowspan="2" style="width:130px" |Date(s) administered
! rowspan="2" style="width:75px" |Sample size
! rowspan="2" style="width:95px" |Margin of error
! colspan="3" |Results
|-
Line 182 ⟶ 202:
On the question of whether one is satisfied with the Civil Service Initiative.
 
{|class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="text-align:center; font-size:90%; width:100%"
! rowspan="2" style="width:100px" |Poll source
! rowspan="2" style="width:130px" |Date(s) administered
! rowspan="2" style="width:75px" |Sample size
! rowspan="2" style="width:95px" |Margin of error
! colspan="6" style="width:800px" |Results
|-
!Very satisfied