22nd Supreme Court: Difference between revisions

m
Adjusted wording for further clarity
m (Adjusted wording for clarity)
m (Adjusted wording for further clarity)
 
Line 148:
However, before a date for the trial could be confirmed or announced, Ludwigsburg publicly insisted on 27 August that the trial be held on the RMB, before reversing course later that day and informing the Court they would "accept punishment without a trial". The Court ultimately issued Ludwigsburg a banjection of 2 weeks from 30 August 2021 in a unanimous decision,{{refn|Punishment issued as per Section 1 of the Criminal Offence Act}} citing historical precedent for the crime's severity and punishment from the [[10th Supreme Court#Tobostan v. Llorens (2018)|Tobostan v. Llorens (2018)]] verdict, though Alternate Justice Super Awesome Fun Times also noted that Ludwigsburg's actions had continued throughout the prosecution process and were likely intentional, indicating "the precedent isn't exactly the same".
 
On 28 August, Speaker Dyl presented the Regional Moderation Bill for public discussion, authored by Greylyn and MGA Podria in part due to increased spam, bad-faith posts, and unnecessary consecutive messages or "double-posting" on the RMB, some of which Ludwigsburg had contributed to. The Bill was passed unanimously by the [[23rd General Assembly]] 6-0-0 on 30 August, the same day that Ludwigsburg was convicted, codifying a tieredwarning-based moderation of specific disruptive RMB activities beyond the Criminal Offence Act's provision on "Spamming or trolling".
 
==Notes==