22nd Supreme Court: Difference between revisions
m
Adjusted wording for further clarity
(Added case results table (for future use with trials, similar to legal rulings table) and aftermath/note on RMB moderation, fixed spelling) |
m (Adjusted wording for further clarity) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 148:
However, before a date for the trial could be confirmed or announced, Ludwigsburg publicly insisted on 27 August that the trial be held on the RMB, before reversing course later that day and informing the Court they would "accept punishment without a trial". The Court ultimately issued Ludwigsburg a banjection of 2 weeks from 30 August 2021 in a unanimous decision,{{refn|Punishment issued as per Section 1 of the Criminal Offence Act}} citing historical precedent for the crime's severity and punishment from the [[10th Supreme Court#Tobostan v. Llorens (2018)|Tobostan v. Llorens (2018)]] verdict, though Alternate Justice Super Awesome Fun Times also noted that Ludwigsburg's actions had continued throughout the prosecution process and were likely intentional, indicating "the precedent isn't exactly the same".
On 28 August, Speaker Dyl presented the Regional Moderation Bill for public discussion, authored by
==Notes==
| |||