22nd Supreme Court: Difference between revisions
m
Adjusted wording for further clarity
Lawrencedepe (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{infobox | title = 21st Supreme Court | subheader = {{nowrap|<small>← 21st —</small> 22nd <small>— 23rd Supreme Court|23...") |
m (Adjusted wording for further clarity) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{infobox
| title =
| subheader = {{nowrap|<small>← [[21st Supreme Court|21st]] —</small> [[22nd Supreme Court|22nd]] <small>— [[23rd Supreme Court|23rd]] →</small>}}
| image1 = [[File:Rosy Red.png|200px]]
Line 10:
| header3 = Dates
| label4 = Start | data4 = 22 June 2021
| label5 = End | data5 = 23 September 2021
}}
The '''22nd Supreme Court''' was appointed by Secretary New Samon and confirmed by citizens in individual confidence votes. This
==Members==
{{Horizontal timeline
|from=-15
|to=
|inc=15
|axis-nudge=-0.25em
Line 57:
|row1-1-text='''Chief Justice'''<br><small>(int. elected)</small>
|row1-1-to=2
|row1-2-to=
|row1-2-style=style3
|row1-2-text='''New Arkados'''<br><sup>24 Jun 2021-
|row2=timeline
Line 65:
|row2-1-text=
|row2-1-to=0
|row2-2-to=
|row2-2-style=style1
|row2-2-text='''Eloren'''<br><sup>22 Jun 2021-
|row3=timeline
Line 73:
|row3-1-text='''Standing Justices (3)'''<br><small>(appointed)</small>
|row3-1-to=0
|row3-2-to=
|row3-2-style=style2
|row3-2-text='''Grod Island'''<br><sup>22 Jun 2021-
|row4=timeline
Line 82:
|row4-1-text=
|row4-1-to=0
|row4-2-to=
|row4-2-style=style3
|row4-2-text='''New Arkados'''<br><sup>22 Jun 2021-
|row5=timeline
Line 90:
|row5-1-text= '''Alternate Justice'''<br><small>(appointed)</small>
|row5-1-to=0
|row5-2-to=
|row5-2-style=style4
|row5-2-text='''Super Awesome Fun Times'''<br><sup>22 Jun 2021-
|row6=scale
Line 124:
As a result, all four appointees were confirmed to their posts.
==
The Supreme Court
{| class="wikitable" style="float:left; width:100%"
! style="width:15%" |
! style="width:10%" | Date issued
! style="width:
! style="width:
! style="width:10%" | Verdict
|-
| align="center" | Banjection of Ludwigsburg<br><small>(no formal trial)</small>
| align="center" | 30 August 2021
| align="center" | 11 counts of "Spamming or trolling that disrupts regional activity or personal communications"
| align="center" | Found guilty by Eloren, Grod Island, New Arkados (3-0), supported by Super Awesome Fun Times (non-voting)
| align="center" | Guilty, banjection for two weeks
|}
Unless otherwise noted, the Chief Justice presided over each case.
===Banjection of Ludwigsburg===
A trial request against Ludwigsburg, presented by Chief Justice New Arkados, was filed on 25 August 2021 with 11 alleged counts of "Spamming or trolling that disrupts regional activity or personal communications".{{refn|A violation under Section 1.m of the Criminal Offence Act}} The Supreme Court unanimously agreed to the hosting of a trial on 26 August, and New Arkados contacted all parties involved to confirm a trial date.{{refn|Court procedure as defined by Sections 2.b and 3.a of the Judicial Process Act, with public notice of the trial intended to be issued "at least one day before it commences"; commencement of this particular case's trial was never confirmed}}
However, before a date for the trial could be confirmed or announced, Ludwigsburg publicly insisted on 27 August that the trial be held on the RMB, before reversing course later that day and informing the Court they would "accept punishment without a trial". The Court ultimately issued Ludwigsburg a banjection of 2 weeks from 30 August 2021 in a unanimous decision,{{refn|Punishment issued as per Section 1 of the Criminal Offence Act}} citing historical precedent for the crime's severity and punishment from the [[10th Supreme Court#Tobostan v. Llorens (2018)|Tobostan v. Llorens (2018)]] verdict, though Alternate Justice Super Awesome Fun Times also noted that Ludwigsburg's actions had continued throughout the prosecution process and were likely intentional, indicating "the precedent isn't exactly the same".
On 28 August, Speaker Dyl presented the Regional Moderation Bill for public discussion, authored by Greylyn and MGA Podria due to increased spam, bad-faith posts, and unnecessary consecutive messages or "double-posting" on the RMB, some of which Ludwigsburg had contributed to. The Bill was passed unanimously by the [[23rd General Assembly]] 6-0-0 on 30 August, the same day that Ludwigsburg was convicted, codifying a warning-based moderation of specific disruptive RMB activities beyond the Criminal Offence Act's provision on "Spamming or trolling".
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
{{The Leftist Assembly}}
[[Category:Supreme Courts|#
| |||