18th Supreme Court: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
Lawrencedepe (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{infobox | headerstyle = background:#ffcc00; |- | header1 = Term Chronology | label2 = Previous | data2 = 17th Supreme Court | label3 = Next | data3 = 19th Supreme Cour...") |
Lawrencedepe (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
|-▼
{{infobox
| title = 18th Supreme Court
| subheader = {{nowrap|<small>← [[17th Supreme Court|17th]] —</small> [[18th Supreme Court|18th]] <small>— [[19th Supreme Court|19th]] →</small>}}
| image1 = [[File:Rosy Red.png|200px]]
| headerstyle = background:#ffcc00;
Line 19 ⟶ 12:
| header5 = Dates
| label6 = Start | data6 = 20 June 2020
| label7 = End | data7 = 19 September 2020
}}
The '''18th Supreme Court''' was appointed by Secretary Greylyn and confirmed by citizens in individual confidence votes. This consisted of three Justices, and each served a three-month term from 20 June to 19 September 2020. The final members of the 18th Supreme Court were Nangka, New Arkados, and South Miruva.
==Members==
Line 41 ⟶ 34:
==Confirmations==
===Initial===
The following
{|class="wikitable" style="text-align:center"
Line 62 ⟶ 56:
The Supreme Court may issue legal rulings on any disputes over the interpretation of regional law. The following are the legal rulings that were issued during the term of the 18th Supreme Court:
{| class="wikitable" style="float:left; width:100%"
! style="width:
! style="width:
! style="width:
! style="width:
▲|-
| align="center" | [https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=39877551 #6.1 (Discord Server Jurisdiction)]
| align="center" | 24 Jul 2020▼
| align="center" | Supported by Nangka and New Arkados. South Miruva abstained.
| align="center" |
* Determined that additional legislation is required for the General Assembly to specifically extend its legal jurisdiction and exert control over the social Discord server
* Initiated by the related debate on control over the region's social Discord server and withdrawn legislation seeking to automatically make the Secretary an administrator of the server
|-
| align="center" | [https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=39961407 #6.2 (Discord Server Jurisdiction)]
▲| align="center" |
| align="center" | 30 Jul 2020
| align="center" | Supported by Nangka and New Arkados. South Miruva abstained.
| align="center" |
* Reaffirmed #6.1, determining that the General Assembly may pass legislation to extend its legal jurisdiction over the social Discord server, but that it has no inherent jurisdiction over it
* Initiated by a further inquiry by Speaker Kavagrad following ruling #6.1 questioning whether the largely autonomous social Discord server should be responsible to a government elected by voters who may not be members of the server
|}
{{The Leftist Assembly}}
[[Category:Supreme Courts
| |||