18th Supreme Court: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
Lawrencedepe (talk | contribs) m (→Confirmations) |
Lawrencedepe (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
|-▼
}}▼
{{infobox
| title = 18th Supreme Court
| subheader = {{nowrap|<small>← [[17th Supreme Court|17th]] —</small> [[18th Supreme Court|18th]] <small>— [[19th Supreme Court|19th]] →</small>}}
| image1 = [[File:Rosy Red.png|200px]]
| headerstyle = background:#ffcc00;
Line 41 ⟶ 34:
==Confirmations==
===Initial===
The following were the results of the confidence votes on Secretary Greylyn's initial appointees to the Supreme Court:
Line 58 ⟶ 52:
As a result, all three appointees were confirmed to their posts.
==Legal rulings==
The Supreme Court may issue legal rulings on any disputes over the interpretation of regional law. The following are the legal rulings that were issued during the term of the 18th Supreme Court:
{| class="wikitable" style="float:left; width:100%"
! style="width:15%" | Ruling name
! style="width:10%" | Date issued
! style="width:15%" | Vote
! style="width:60%" | Summary of ruling
▲|-
| align="center" | [https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=39877551 #6.1 (Discord Server Jurisdiction)]
| align="center" | 24 Jul 2020
| align="center" | Supported by Nangka and New Arkados. South Miruva abstained.
| align="center" |
* Determined that additional legislation is required for the General Assembly to specifically extend its legal jurisdiction and exert control over the social Discord server
* Initiated by the related debate on control over the region's social Discord server and withdrawn legislation seeking to automatically make the Secretary an administrator of the server
|-
| align="center" | [https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=39961407 #6.2 (Discord Server Jurisdiction)]
| align="center" | 30 Jul 2020
| align="center" | Supported by Nangka and New Arkados. South Miruva abstained.
| align="center" |
* Reaffirmed #6.1, determining that the General Assembly may pass legislation to extend its legal jurisdiction over the social Discord server, but that it has no inherent jurisdiction over it
* Initiated by a further inquiry by Speaker Kavagrad following ruling #6.1 questioning whether the largely autonomous social Discord server should be responsible to a government elected by voters who may not be members of the server
{{The Leftist Assembly}}
| |||