14th Supreme Court: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

14th Supreme Court (edit)

Revision as of 08:59, 26 February 2021

770 bytes added , 3 years ago

m

no edit summary

VisualWikitext

Lawrencedepe

Bureaucrats, Administrators

2,118

edits

Revision as of 02:35, 2 August 2020 (edit) Lawrencedepe (talk \| contribs) (Created page with "{{infobox \| headerstyle = background:#ffcc00; \|- \| header1 = Term Chronology \| label2 = Previous \| data2 = 13th Supreme Court \| label3 = Next \| data3 = 15th Supreme Cour...")		Latest revision as of 08:59, 26 February 2021 (edit) (undo) Lawrencedepe (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: ~~{{infobox~~ ~~\| headerstyle = background:#ffcc00;~~ \|-▼ ~~\| header1 = Term Chronology~~ ~~\| label2 = Previous \| data2 = [[13th Supreme Court]]~~ ~~\| label3 = Next \| data3 = [[15th Supreme Court]]~~ }} {{infobox \| title = 14th Supreme Court \| subheader = {{nowrap\|<small>← [[13th Supreme Court\|13th]] —</small> [[14th Supreme Court\|14th]] <small>— [[15th Supreme Court\|15th]] →</small>}} \| image1 = [[File:Rosy Red.png\|200px]] \| headerstyle = background:#ffcc00; Line 41 ⟶ 34: ==Confirmations== ===Initial=== The following are the results of the confidence votes on Secretary The Final Horseman's initial appointees to the Supreme Court: Line 62 ⟶ 56: The Supreme Court may issue legal rulings on any disputes over the interpretation of regional law. The following are the legal rulings that were issued during the term of the 14th Supreme Court: {\| class="wikitable" style="float:left; width:100%" ! style="width:~~50px~~15%" \| ~~No.~~Ruling name ! style="width:~~75px~~10%" \| Date issued ! style="width:~~300px~~15%" \| ~~Main law/s~~Vote ! style="width:~~300px~~60%" \| ~~Outcome~~Summary of ruling ▲\|- \| align="center" \| [https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=35843738 #1 (Ministerial Policy Application)] \| align="center" \| 3 Jul 2019 \| align="center" \| Supported by Auven, Llorens, and Morvan. \| * Determined that Ministers may apply relevant policy as legislated by the General Assembly, rather than the General Assembly being required to vote on the application of each policy * Initiated by a dispute over Minister of Foreign Affairs Hecknamistan's decision to close the embassy with The Verusation Federation without consulting the General Assembly, which was deemed legal \|- \| align="center" \| [https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=~~35843738~~35869702 #12 (Public Legislative Voting)] \| align="center" \| 36 ~~July~~Jul 2019 \| align="center" \| Supported by Auven, Llorens, and Morvan. ~~\| align="center" \| "The General Assembly shall be responsible for: (a) Voting on proposed laws, amendments, and policies" <small>(Section IV.3 of the Constitution)</small>~~ \| ~~\| align="center" \| The application of those policies is a ministerial duty separate from the legislating of policies.~~ * Determined that the status quo practice of the General Assembly voting in a private channel and releasing the vote outcome publicly satisfied the requirement for all votes to be "viewable to the public" \|- \| align="center" \| [https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=~~35869702~~36358331 #23 (Election Candidate Departure)] \| align="center" \| 56 ~~July~~Sep 2019 \| align="center" \| Supported by Auven, Llorens, and Morvan. ~~\| align="center" \| "All General Assembly votes on legislation shall be viewable to the public" <small>(Legislature Conduct Act)</small>~~ \| ~~\| align="center" \| It can be conducted privately and the votes of members can be released publicly once done.~~ * Determined that an election candidate is not immediately disqualified if they depart the region and do not publicly state their withdrawal from the race, though they may communicate this through the Supreme Court * Initiated by the departure of Grand Proudhonia, a Secretary candidate in the September 2019 general election, from the region \|} {{The Leftist Assembly}} [[Category:Supreme Courts ~~of The Leftist Assembly~~\|#014]]